Will Another
Huge IPO Bubble Lead to Another Huge Crash?
By the Curmudgeon
Introduction:
The IPO market is
soaring. Last week, super strong buying
sent food delivery start-up DoorDash stock up 86% in its trading debut
Wednesday. Vacation home rental stalwart
Airbnb shares more than doubled in their debut a day later. DoorDash is currently valued at $56 billion,
just shy of General Motors while Airbnb is worth over $83 billion, more than
FedEx Corp.
Airbnb CEO
Brian Chesky was at a loss for words in a
Bloomberg TV appearance when he was told of the companys opening share
price. Perhaps thats because Airbnbs
annual revenue growth slowed from 80% during 2016 to 31% during 2019. Bookings tanked
early in the pandemic, and revenue in the first nine months of 2020 was down
32% from the year-earlier period.
Valuations of recent IPOs are
at their highest levels since the dot-com bubble, relative to the companies
revenue, sparking concerns among investors about the level of froth in the
market.
The financial asset mania doesnt stop with the IPO market. For example,
Special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings II (NYSE:IPOB)
soared more than 18% on Monday, solely due to stating the ticker symbol it will
have following its pending merger with real estate disruptor Opendoor Technologies.
In this post, we examine signs
of speculative excess that have ALWAYS preceded a MAJOR stock market crash
(think the DOT COM bubble bursting).
Next is our assessment of the frothy IPO market with lots of statistics
to prove our point. We conclude with a note about zombie companies and a few
closing quotes on the IPOs.
Warning Signs Abound:
Signs of financial euphoria
are everywhere. Here are just a few:
·
19 stocks have doubled on their first day of trading in
2020, the most since 2000, the peak of dot-com mania.
· November
was the best return in history for US small caps with the Russell 2000 +18.3%
for that month. Its
now at the most overbought level in 20 years.
·
The S&P 500 is trading at over 40 times EPS, and next
year's 26 times EPS number is probably too low (unless earnings surprise to the
upside).
·
Option traders are in the greatest call-buying frenzy
since July 2000 (see Chart 1. below)
·
Record-high $14 billion net inflows to value vs. growth
ETFs in recent weeks.
· Exchange-traded
funds (ETFs) are on pace to add $466 billion, the biggest year of inflows ever
(see Chart 2. below). At the current pace there will be more assets in passive
equity funds than active by 2022.
· B of A
Researchs Bull & Bear Indicator jumped to 5.8 (8=sell signal) while
inflows triggered a sell signal for Emerging Market equities.
·
Wall Street brokerage firms/investment banks are also
bullish: B of A Researchs Sell-Side
Indicator is the closest to a sell signal since 2007.
Chart 1. U.S. Call/Put Volume Source:
B of A Research
.
Chart 2. U.S. ETF Inflows in 2020
have surpassed their 2017 all-time high
Source: B of A Research
...
Assessing the IPO Stock Mania:
Speculators have valued newly public
(loosely defined) tech companies at a median of 23.9 times the revenue
(NOT earnings) reported in the 12 months before going public, according to
University of Florida Business school Professor Jay Ritter, who tracks
initial public offerings. That measure is by far the highest of the past two
decades. The valuations imply
investors are counting on years of continued rapid growth by these companies,
hoping some will dominate their industries and churn out large profits, he
said.
The result has been that the
market capitalizations of many money-losing high-flying IPOs are now greater
than giant, highly profitable stalwarts of corporate America. For example,
Airbnb is worth more than Marriott International Inc., Hilton Worldwide
Holdings Inc. and Hyatt Hotels Corp. combined, by market capitalization. Its worth about the same as online travel giant Booking
Holdings Inc., a slower-growth company that had more than double Airbnbs
revenue in the 12 months through September and had a $1.3 billion profit. DoorDash
is worth nearly double fast-food operator Yum Brands Inc., the owner of Pizza
Hut, Taco Bell, and KFC.
Ritter commented in a Bloomberg article that 80% of the
companies that went public this year were unprofitable in the 12 months prior
to their IPO. Yet the Renaissance IPO
ETF (IPO) is up 111.52% year to date (YTD). This ETF has 48 holdings with over
10% in both Uber Technologies (UBER) and Moderna (MRNA). It has $670 million in
assets with a somewhat-high expense ratio of 0.60%.
I have a great deal of difficulty
understanding the valuations of some of these companies, Prof. Ritter said.
The difference in enthusiasm for the unprofitable young companies and old
corporate giants with consistent profits is night and day, Ritter added.
Theres more
IPO madness: Software company Snowflake Inc., which went public in September,
is worth more than 200 times the $489 million in revenue it made in the 12
months through October. Data-analysis firm Palantir Technologies Inc., which
went public in September at a roughly $21 billion valuation, is now worth $50
billion, or 50 times its revenue.
At least three
electric-vehicle companies valued at over $2 billion have gone public this year
with no revenue, while numerous other tiny companies with large private
valuations in the electric-vehicle sector are planning public listings.
Whats going
on here? For most of the 2010s, the median multiple
for a tech company after its first day of trading hovered around 6 times its
revenue in the prior 12 months. The same measurement for stocks on the Nasdaq
Composite Index is 4.3, according to FactSet.
Old pros would expect the new
supply of stock issued in the form of IPOs and secondary offerings to be a
negative headwind for equities this week. Not in a mania. This week, the market has absorbed the new
supply in a manner that hasn't deterred the bullish
trend. For example, Tesla (TSLA)
was +1.8% this week despite selling $5 billion of common stock!
Conclusions:
Were
stumped. With so many Americans
suffering financially due to the pandemic lockdowns and with the real U.S.
economy not expected to recover till 2022 (B of A Research says that it will
not reach the measly 1.7% trend GDP growth until 2022 or beyond), how could
such exuberant speculation be occurring?
ShadowStats John Williams
writes, Severe systemic structural damage from the shutdown will forestall
meaningful economic rebound into 2022 or beyond, irrespective of coronavirus
treatments and vaccines.
Indeed, the economic data has
weakened recently with the second surge of the virus and new lockdown orders
(especially in California). The number of Americans filing for first-time jobless
claims surged to 835,000 for the week ended Dec. 5th, up from
716,000 the week before. The next U.S.
economic number to watch is Industrial Production, to be reported on Dec. 16th.
Meanwhile, coronavirus related
government stimulus payments have resulted in 16% of OECD companies becoming
"zombies" (income doesn't cover debt
payments), which means that even in an economic rebound, revenues go to balance
sheet repair instead of capex. The only cure for zombies is significantly more
aggregate demand, but that wont happen with stay at home
health orders in effect.
Closing Quotes:
The valuations are better in the
public markets than private markets, which was not the case in 19 or 18,
Rajeev Misra, who runs SoftBank Group Corp.s $100
billion Vision Fund, said in a conversation with an analyst at New Street
Research LLP last month. The public markets are very buoyant. [SoftBank was by far the largest investor in
startups in the past few years, flooding companies like WeWork,
Uber and DoorDash with cash.]
While we are generally a bit
skeptical of irrational exuberance claims, IPO behavior is starting to
look very frothy, said stock market research firm Bespoke.
A lot of entrepreneurs now
realize its a very receptive and attractive public market, said Rich Wong,
a partner at venture-capital firm Accel, an early investor in Slack
Technologies Inc. and Facebook Inc. If the rally stays apace, 2021 will
definitely be the most active IPO market in the last 20 years, he said.
There is no doubt that the
emergence of a much larger cohort of retail investors-slash-traders are moving
markets. There seems to be an entire
subculture of people that sort of follow the same things, talk to each other on
social media and drive enthusiasm for individual issues. And sometimes it makes
no fundamental sense to anybody, said Art Hogan, chief market strategist
at National Securities Corp.
This doesnt end well
historically, but for the time being its the nature of the beast. But it didnt take long after 2000 to see that cohort of day trader
types fade into the sunset, not really come back until really March and April
of this year when things exploded again, Hogan added.
.
Good health, stay calm and
safe, persevere under lockdowns and till next time
.
The Curmudgeon
ajwdct@gmail.com
Follow
the Curmudgeon on Twitter @ajwdct247
Curmudgeon is a retired investment professional. He has
been involved in financial markets since 1968 (yes, he cut his teeth on the
1968-1974 bear market), became an SEC Registered Investment Advisor in 1995,
and received the Chartered Financial Analyst designation from AIMR (now CFA
Institute) in 1996. He managed hedged equity and alternative (non-correlated)
investment accounts for clients from 1992-2005.
Victor
Sperandeo is a historian, economist and financial innovator who
has re-invented himself and the companies he's owned
(since 1971) to profit in the ever changing and arcane world of markets,
economies and government policies.
Victor started his Wall Street career in 1966 and began trading for a
living in 1968. As President and CEO of Alpha Financial Technologies LLC,
Sperandeo oversees the firm's research and development platform, which is used
to create innovative solutions for different futures markets, risk parameters
and other factors.
Copyright © 2020 by the Curmudgeon and
Marc Sexton. All rights reserved.
Readers are PROHIBITED from
duplicating, copying, or reproducing article(s) written
by The Curmudgeon and Victor Sperandeo without providing the URL of the
original posted article(s).