New
Monetary Easing by the ECB Has Many Hidden Dangers
by the Curmudgeon with Victor Sperandeo
Executive
Summary:
On Thursday, March 10th the European Central
Bank (ECB) announced a huge new package of financial measures to stimulate the
Eurozone economy, with expanded quantitative easing (QE), incentives to banks
to increase lending and further interest rate cuts in negative territory. In particular:
·
The ECB
cut its deposit rate by 10 basis points to – 0.4% with the intent to stimulate
Eurozone lenders to increase credit to households and companies.
·
The ECB
also raised the amount of bonds the central bank buys each month (QE) from €60bn
to €80bn — a greater amount than many analysts had expected. It also expanded
the range of assets it will buy to include high quality corporate bonds.
·
The main
refinancing rate was also cut by 5 basis points to 0%.
·
Four targeted
longer-term refinancing operations (TLTRO II), which will
offer attractive long-term funding conditions to banks to further ease private
sector credit conditions and to stimulate credit creation (see Victor's
comments below).
ECB President Mario Draghi said interest rates would stay
low for “an extended period” and he kept open the option of a further cut. He also expressed concern about negative
rates among top central bankers, saying he did not anticipate pushing deeper
into negative territory, partly because of the negative impact on banks.
“Does it mean we can go as low as we want without having
any consequences on the banking system? The answer is no,” Draghi said. To help Eurozone banks, it will provide
liquidity through targeted longer-term refinancing operations, with rates as
low as minus 0.4% — in effect paying them to borrow money.
Not all ECB policymakers backed the package, which
included cuts to all the central bank’s benchmark interest rates. The vote was
19 to 2 in favor, with dissenting votes cast by the head of the Dutch central
bank, Klaas Knot, and Sabine Lautenschläger,
the German member of the ECB governing council.
The ECB slightly cut its macroeconomic forecast. The ECB
cut its GDP forecasts for 2016 to +1.4% from +1.7% and for 2017 to +1.7% from
+1.9%. The central bank sharply
downgraded its inflation forecast to 0.1% this year, from the 1% it had
predicted in December. Mr. Draghi said it was “crucial” to avoid very weak
inflation taking hold across the economy.
Financial Times (FT) Analysis:
Central bankers were once
celebrated as the miracle workers of the global economy, but many people wonder
whether they have lost their magic powers.
Central banks’ efforts to save the global financial system from collapse
might have worked but, despite ultra-loose monetary policy, growth and
inflation remain weak and in the Eurozone unemployment remains painfully high.
The ECB’s big idea to silence
the doubters is an auction of their cash that will, if it works, in effect
involve central bankers paying banks to lend to businesses and households.
Policymakers are praying these auctions, dubbed Targeted Longer-Term
Refinancing Operations, or TLTROs, will finally produce the meaningful
recovery that the single currency area craves.
“The ECB has designed its
suite of measures to have the most impact on activity,” said Karen Ward, chief
European economist at HSBC Investment Bank. “[It] has changed the emphasis of
its actions from depressing the exchange rate and relying on external demand
and higher import prices to trying to fuel the domestic recovery by nurturing
the banks to support credit growth.”
The idea of the auctions was
presented by officials and the package was supported by all but four of the 25-member
governing council in what Mr. Draghi described as “a very reassuring
discussion.” Under the ECB’s system of rotation only two dissenters had votes
this month. The ECB will hold four
auctions — one a quarter from June 2016 to March 2017. Banks can bid for cash
of the value of as much as 30% of their loan book. At most, they pay nothing on
the four-year loans, which they will not have to pay back until 2020 at the
earliest. But if the banks lend more, then the ECB will pay them up to 0.4%t
interest on the lenders’ loans with the central bank. The big question is whether banks, businesses
and households will take the bite?
Paying private banks to lend
is novel, even for a generation of monetary policymakers used to rolling out
shock-and-awe measures. Yet earlier designs of the TLTRO were touted as game
changers and in the end proved much less effective than ECB hoped.
In a region drained of
confidence, businesses and households might not want to borrow. Or banks could
use the funds to invest in financial markets instead of expanding their loan
books, pumping up asset prices but leaving the Eurozone economy flat.
“While [the new TLTRO] is
clearly groundbreaking, it remains to be seen whether it will work,” said
Carsten Brzeski, chief economist at ING-DiBa. He added: “The ECB is clearly determined to keep on
fighting. Admitting impotence does not seem to be an option.”
Euro Whipsaw:
In one of the most volatile days in Euro history, the
single currency fell nearly 1.5% Thursday as the ECB unveiled its wide-ranging
package of monetary easing measures, only to reverse course and soar close to
2% higher above $1.12 per US dollar. The
trigger for the reverse appeared to be Mario Draghi’s press conference after
Thursday’s announcement where the ECB president implied there was a limit to
further negative interest rates. Euro
volatility continued on Friday, the single currency first retreating 0.75% to
$1.1090, before rising back to $1.1176, the level at which it began the trading
day. At press time, the Euro was trading
at $1.1157.
Victor's Comments - “PhD Standard” with a Twist:
The "PhD Standard.” That's what James Grant (Grant's Interest
Rate Observer) called QE monetary policy in October 2012. It certainly applies to Draghi's
extraordinary monetary measures announced on Thursday. The ECB's bazooka moves are intended to
increase Eurozone inflation, which I think is to reduce the debt of Europe.
Of course, inflation is a hidden tax which also tends to reduce the exchange
rate of the currency.
Few noted a critical twist in Thursday's ECB
announcement: the ECB will PAY Eurozone banks 40 bps if they actually make
loans with the free money from the ECB.
So it's actually not a -40 negative rate any more as the
Eurozone banks will get paid more to do what they are in business to do in the
first place! Who will pay the ECB the
money to transfer 40 bps to the banks? THE TAXPAYER! The taxpayer doesn't get the bill right away;
it is in the form of print fiat money or the hidden tax on the people. This is an example of why I believe the
financial system has to lead to economic collapse sometime in the future.
Who are the losers with these negative rates, besides the
bulk of the people? The Pension Funds and Insurance Companies who do NOT get
the 40 bps!
There is a crisis in the insurance business as the flat
yield curve from the weak economy and negative interest rates are causing
losses in the "whole life" insurance business. You can understand
that the way insurance companies made money was to guarantee a 3.5% to 4% rates
on “whole life insurance” policies, but then invest in Corporate Bonds at 5+%.
However, the current yield on the DJ Equal Weight US Corporate Bond Index
is only 3.25% (as per Barron's 3/14/16 edition, page M52). This is a small
part of the collateral damage done by the 'PHD Standard."
……………………………………………………………………………….
Sidebar: Danger of Inflation Debauching the Currency:
From The
Economic Consequences of the Peace (1919), by John Maynard
Keynes:
“Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to
destroy the Capitalist System was to debauch the currency. By a continuing
process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an
important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only
confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process
impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary
rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security, but at confidence in the
equity of the existing distribution of wealth.”
This latter most important insight by Keynes, and what
Central Bankers have accomplished is "...while the process impoverishes
many, it actually enriches some." For example, the holders of equities for
the last seven years has enriched the very rich, but has not benefited the man
on the street.
……………………………………………………………………………….
Victor's End Note:
Let's end with a quote from the first and still the
greatest U.S. Progressive (i.e. someone who attempts to undermine the
Constitution) - Woodrow Wilson (page 49 of his New
Freedom book):
"The government of the United States at present is a
foster-child of the special interests. It is not allowed to have a will of its
own."
Today, “the special interests” are the bankers who own
the FED!
Good luck and till next time...
The
Curmudgeon
ajwdct@sbumail.com
Follow the
Curmudgeon on Twitter @ajwdct247
Curmudgeon is a retired investment professional. He has
been involved in financial markets since 1968 (yes, he cut his teeth on the
1968-1974 bear market), became an SEC Registered Investment Advisor in 1995, and
received the Chartered Financial Analyst designation from AIMR (now CFA
Institute) in 1996. He managed hedged equity and alternative
(non-correlated) investment accounts for clients from 1992-2005.
Victor Sperandeo is a
historian, economist and financial innovator who has re-invented himself and
the companies he's owned (since 1971) to profit in the ever changing and arcane
world of markets, economies and government policies. Victor started his Wall Street career in 1966
and began trading for a living in 1968. As President and CEO of Alpha Financial
Technologies LLC, Sperandeo oversees the firm's research and development
platform, which is used to create innovative solutions for different futures
markets, risk parameters and other factors.
Copyright © 2015 by the
Curmudgeon and Marc Sexton. All rights reserved.
Readers are PROHIBITED from
duplicating, copying, or reproducing article(s) written
by The Curmudgeon and Victor Sperandeo without providing the URL of the
original posted article(s).